I’ve been doing
this blog now for over 8 years. As the
risk of coming across all ‘it were all
fields here when I were a lad’ and all that, I can remember quite a few of the
bloggers from when I started. One of
them in particular never really struck me as future leadership material. Then again, like with Nicola Sturgeon, I wasn’t
looking for signs of leadership potential with Kezia Dugdale.
...And it's goodnight from him. |
That’s not to say
that she’s not leadership material. The
problem I have is that it’s just too early in her career for her to be landed
with such a huge job. Strike that, it’s
a massive job with the near certain guarantee that her party will be defeated
again in next May’s Holyrood elections. In essence, Dugdale’s task for next May
is to halt her party’s decline and maybe get her party into the position where
Bute House is a realistic shot come 2019 (or whenever the next but one Holyrood
election will be). To do that, they need
to put pressure on the SNP Government.
Under Murphy,
they’d started to do that. Though why
they ran a Holyrood campaign for a Westminster election will be lost on
everyone… unless Murphy tells all in his
memoirs. They’d flagged up the SNP’s
record with waiting times at my local hospital, forgetting that the RAH was
poorly run when Labour were in charge of…
it wasn’t government at that point, was it? They’ve flagged up the labyrinthine
replacements for Standard Grades & Highers as well as the falling
standards.
Of course, none
of this will work without viable policies.
It’s this which Scottish Labour have dramatically failed at for the past
three elections, which explains the relentlessly negative attacks on the SNP. Given the tack hinted at with their attacks
on how the SNP have ran public services, perhaps they should pitch for the
modernisation of those public services. After
all, the SNP have been remarkably conservative when it has come to the running
of those public services. Reorganisation
of the moribund Health Boards might be a flier, while policies aimed at driving
up numeracy & literacy rates could well be eye-catching. If Dugdale was feeling really bold and
radical, she could pledge to replace the Council Tax. A move that would instantly put the SNP on
the back foot – given it was one of their policy pledges in 2007.
The early days,
indeed conceivably whether she lasts beyond next May’s election, probably depends
on the outcome of the main UK wide leadership election. With this in mind, Dugdale should press for
more autonomy for the Scottish party. To
date, we do not know the leadership’s honest opinion of the conduct of Scottish
Labour since… well probably since the
SNP retained power in 2011. Certainly
the seeds of their behaviour goes back that far, Scottish Labour’s decline goes
further. If Dugdale pushed for more
autonomy, it will give her more leeway to push for… ah… “Scottish solutions for Scottish issues”. Policies that might not sit well with Cooper
or Burnham, let alone Corbyn or Kendall.
Conversely, a degree of autonomy might insulate Dugdale from any further
fallout from the UK-wide leadership election.
The only certainties
about Dugdale’s election to the leadership of “Scottish” Labour is that she
faces an uphill battle to even stand still from 2011 and that her fate is not
fully in her own hands. Outside of the
party line, no one really knows what she stands for. In this respect, the comparison is not with
her immediate opponent, Nicola Sturgeon, but with the two most recent
Conservative Prime Ministers. David Cameron
became leader of the Conservatives five years after his entry to the House of
Commons, the fastest rise to leadership of the two main parties since the
war. Hug a Hoodie, Compassionate Conservatism
and Vote Blue, Go Green were his early slogans, but we really had to wait until
the 2010 election campaign to get Cameron.
John Major’s rise
might have been comparatively slow, entering parliament in 1979 and appointed
to cabinet in the aftermath of the 1987 election win followed by being
appointed Foreign Secretary and Chancellor in the 18 months before the fall of
Thatcher, yet the perception was of Major being a Thatcher placeman, rather
than the harbinger of Blairite New Labour-ism (in terms of policy, rather than
presentation) that he became. Dugdale
entered Holyrood in 2011, we are not even at the end of her first full term at
Holyrood. Granted, that rise is nowhere
near as rapid as Ruth Davidson’s rise.
It’s not inconceivable
that Dugdale could end up being the next First Minister in 282 or so days
time, it’s just highly unlikely. Given
the huge hole “Scottish” Labour finds itself in, handing the keys to the car to
the youngest candidate available has the potential to be a recipe for
disaster. If “Scottish” Labour want to
get out of the mess they find themselves in, they must ignore the almost
certain defeat heading their way come next May.
For them, the planning for 2019 begins now.
No comments:
Post a Comment