One of the jibes
thrown by the SNP and their supporters about the upcoming EU Referendum is that
this is an internal dispute within the Conservative Party and that it’s
unseemly for us, presumably the public at large, to be involved in it. True, many of the arguments have had a right
wing tinge to them, but we should hopefully see a more left wing Euroscepticism
– not unlike that outlined by myself two posts back – emerge.
Osborne will be hoping to emulate this man, John Major, as a Chancellor who becomes Prime Minister |
Of course, what
hasn’t helped is the emergence of Boris ‘Boom Boom’ Johnson as a fully fledged Eurosceptic. This has added fuel to the fire that is the
argument that really this referendum might as well be the campaign to see who succeeds
Cameron as Conservative leader, and ultimately PM. What it has ensured is that nobody, for the
moment anyway, is talking about the guy who was – and probably still is –
favourite to succeed Cameron.
I had never
bought into the hype about Osborne. There’s way too much Gordon Brown in
Osborne, he believes his own hype as a master manipulator (probably helped by
Blairites who swallow the Osborne hype as well) and is a ridiculously poor
chancellor. Six years into his term as
Chancellor and the country is still in the sick bed thanks to his policy of
strangling the economy by taking money out of it to shore up the deficit. The hallmark of his chancellorship has been
his eagerness to set traps for his opponents to fall into, to paint his opponents
as whatever he wants them to, rather than managing the economic health of the
country. It’s not that Osborne is
useless as some sort of political chess grandmaster, its more that his card is
marked as someone who is sleekit.
Osborne’s problem
isn’t just confined to his position as a chancellor not as successful as he
would like. History is against Osborne
as well. Since the start of the 20th
century, only six men have made the move directly from number 11 Downing Street
to take up residence next door, four of them Conservatives. Stanley Baldwin was the first in 1923,
shortly before calling & losing an election the following year. Neville Chamberlain was Baldwin’s Chancellor
during his third term and succeeded him as Prime Minister in 1937. Harold Macmillan was Anthony Eden’s
chancellor during the Suez Crisis and succeeded Eden when he resigned at the
start of 1957. The most recent Tory to
make this move was John Major, Chancellor for just over a year (having
previously been Foreign Secretary for just over three months). It is not the guaranteed step into leadership
that many people assume that it is.
If that
particular piece of history doesn’t count against Osborne, then a glance of the
history of Conservative leadership elections should. The one golden rule of Conservative
leadership elections is that the favourite never wins. The first Tory
leadership election saw Edward Heath defeat the marginal favourite Reginald
Maudling. Heath was favourite to see off
his shadow Education secretary, Margaret Thatcher, ten years later. Major was seen as the outsider when Michael
Hestletine launched his bid to oust Thatcher in the autumn of 1990. Kenneth Clark was favourite in both 1997 and
in 2001, but lost both times (to William Hague in ’97 and to Iain Duncan Smith
in 2001). In 2005 David Davis was the
slight favourite, but lost out to the then shadow Education secretary David Cameron.
Indeed the lesson
of this (if we ignore Thatcher’s defeat of Anthony Mayer in 1989 or John Major’s
defeat of John Redwood in 1995) is that the outsiders should be the ones to
watch. Assuming, as most of the professional
commentariat are doing, that the leadership will be between Osborne and Boris. Who
would be the outsiders?
I would suspect
that Theresa May’s chance to lead has gone with Cameron’s General Election win
last year. I’m not convinced that Hammond
has leadership chops while both Gove and Hunt would be too divisive to be
leaders. The Labour aligned blogger Ian
Smart thinks that Nicky Morgan would be someone to watch. She is on the periphery of things and could
be a good outside bet. Certainly one to
watch, but I think there’s a better candidate out there.
Sajid Javed is
sufficiently under the radar, and knows perfectly how to say the correct things
to a Conservative audience. He has the
makings of being a conference favourite in the future, whatever his future, and
knows intuitively how to play to the right of his party. Even when speaking about the EU, he has
backed his leaders plans though has placed his euroscepticism near the front of
his speeches. When the time comes to
choose a successor to Cameron, I believe the Conservative Party will tire of
being run by Eton alumni – because of jibes about jobs for the boys and being
ruled by elites – and pick someone who in many ways is more like the Tories
last PM from blue collar stock, John Major.
At a time when the stock of immigration is not at it’s best, what would
be more Conservative than to pull off another rags to riches success story
whilst wrong footing Labour at the same time – to paraphrase a 1990’s slogan,
what to the Conservatives have to offer the son of an immigrant who got a job
as a bus conductor – they could make him leader.
I can see two
scenarios playing out for the next Tory leadership election. One involves Osborne and Boris fighting it out
and Javid coming through the middle. The
other involves Osborne running but damaged by recession and his record coming
back to haunt him while Boris is also running but as a backbencher, having been
exiled by Cameron post referendum. Either
scenario is likely to happen, and in both outcomes the end result for Osborne
is not the prize he seeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment