One of the
strangest by products of conference season has been the claim that Ed Milliband
is now proposing to bring Socialism back into British public life. This claim says more about those making the
claim than it does about a leader taking his party 5 millimetres to the left of
New Labour.
The claim is
based on two policy announcements made during Milliband’s speech. The announcement of a freeze in energy prices
for the first 18 months of the next parliament should Labour win and the taking
back of land from owners who do not develop the site after a set period of
ownership. Both policies are claimed to
be a return to socialism. Both policies
are not even remotely a return to, as the press have been saying, the dreaded ‘70’s.
With the freeze
in energy prices, this is to enable the incoming government to restructure the
energy market. There has been unproven
claims of a cartel between the energy companies for years now, this
restructuring is designed to shake up this market. Yet polling evidence suggests that the
British public would like to see the political parties go further to help
consumers. The big problem with Milliband’s policy is that this policy is likely
to be unworkable thanks to green subsidies.
Miliband’s other policy was originally proposed by that well known
leftie, Boris Johnson.
Yet if you looked
at the press in this country, they have reacted in horror to Milliband’s
proposals – dubbing Milliband’s proposals a return to ‘70’s style
socialism. Yet not a word has been
raised regarding the Energy companies bullying tones regarding the lights going
out or the popularity of this proposal.
Of course, most of the anglocentric print media seems to support Cameron’s
Conservatives. The rubbishing of
Milliband’s policies clearly falls into this narrative. While it’s one thing for the press to be
aghast at the return of what they see as socialism and for Cameron to fall into
this trap, it’s another for one of the Anglocentric print media to… ah…
play the man and not the ball.
The Daily Mail’s
opinion piece on Milliband’s father – with the strap line “The Man Who Hated
Britain” – was an utterly low blow and showed the desperation of the Mail. Even more despicable was the defence put up
by journalists working for the Mail.
Their editor Paul “double see you
next Tuesday” Dacre justified it with Milliband’s constant referencing of
his father in his speeches. Except that,
as I have said, Milliband’s speech wasn’t particularly socialist which kind of
torpedo’s the Mail’s argument straight away.
The interesting
thing though is that the whole “Red Ed” tag has been really shown up with the
current referendum debate. The CommonWeal proposals caught the attention of the “Yes” campaigners. The proposals – with the aim of bringing in
Nordic quality of life to Scotland – are infinitely more left wing that anything
circulating around the British Labour party.
Yet it’s only in the last couple of weeks that “Scottish” Labour has thought
of looking at the Common Weal proposals. In the meantime, the main UK Labour party runs
away from any policies that could be construed as being socialist. Red Ed?
More like Pink Ed to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment