At the weekend,
Alex Salmond won the annual worst kept secret of the year award for the open
secret that he was returning to front line politics by standing for Westminster,
a record three weeks after stepping down as Scotland’s First Minister. The second worst secret being his candidacy
for the Gordon seat, held by the retiring Malcolm Bruce and third on the list
of target seats for the SNP.
The consensus
among the Mac-commentariat is that Salmond will storm home and win this
seat. The consensus among SNP supporters
is that the SNP will be key players after the next Westminster elections. While I think it won’t be the cakewalk some
of the commentariat describe, being the member at Holyrood does help as the
fact that there will be no “incumbency factor” at play here. I’m not entirely sure that the SNP’s
influence post election will be anywhere near the (inflated) perception of
hardline Yes supporters.
The main reason
for this will be the unpopularity of the SNP among the main Westminster
parties. If you didn’t know already, the
animosity between the Tories and Labour is a mere playground spat compared to the
mutual loathing between Labour and the SNP.
Labour loves to bring up 1979 and sniggers at a party could have a word
linking it to Hitler while the SNP loves a moral high ground more than any
other British party (well, except pre-coalition Lib Dems – whose piousness
riled John Major so much). Had members
of the Scottish Greens burned copies of the Smith Report, there would have been
a bit of exposure but nothing compared to the (Labour orchestrated) media storm
that the story became. They just don’t
like each other.
Not that the SNP
are any more popular with the other parties, but truth be told the relationship
between the two parties is easily the most poisonous in British politics. You could maybe see a similar opinion of Tory
“wets” towards UKIP develop if UKIP gain any more seats. In this respect, the UKIP/Conservative
relationship potentially could develop along similar lines to Labour’s relationship
with the SNP. The former relationship
still has some way to go though.
Ironically
enough, given their supposed delusions at the last party conference, the Lib
Dems would still be the go to party for coalition. Sure we don’t know what the background
strains were like, but if Tory grandee’s like Major and Clarke can compliment
the Lib Dems on their behaviour as “junior” partners, then the Tories could do
worse.
Labour on the
other hand are probably still smarting from Clegg’s ramrod refusal to deal with
Brown in 2010, so any deal would have a Clegg (or Alexander… or for that matter
any of the other Orange Bookers at the top of the party) sized stumbling
block. What won’t help matters would be
Clegg’s astonishing performance at PMQ’s yesterday. Astonishing being one word I could use, given
his claims about Labour’s treatment of pensioners. Mind you seeing as the Orange Bookers are
much easier bedfellows with the Tories than with Labour, they would prefer a
second coalition with the Conservatives.
On the other hand, whether the grass roots would tolerate a second
snubbing of Labour would be another matter entirely. Perhaps after Clegg’s rank
awful showing at Prime Ministers Questions, the Lib Dem rank and file might
take that decision out of his hands…
All of this is,
of course, pure speculation. Next years
Westminster election is still very much up for grabs, UKPR’s polling is still
showing Labour ahead… just. There is still a lot of water to come under
the bridge before we find out whether any party will get a majority. In the meantime, do not be surprised that, even
if the nationalist bloc get 20-40 seats, they still find themselves on the outside
and frozen out while power is divvied up.
No comments:
Post a Comment